United States v. Lacey Lee Koenig and Lee Graf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that one of the defendants had no privacy right in a package when he was neither the sender nor the addressee of the package
• noting that the agency analysis in the Fourth Amendment context shares the same \highly factual nature\ as the common law agency analysis
• noting that the two critical factors “are not independently sufficient to convert a private search into a governmental search”
• inquiring (1) whether the government knew about and acquiesced to the intrusive conduct, and (2) whether the private party acted in self-interest or to assist the government in obtaining incriminating information
• inquiring (1) whether the government knew about and acquiesced to the intrusive conduct, and (2) whether the private party acted in self-interest or to assist the government in obtaining incriminating information
• the analysis must be made “on a case-by-case basis and in light of all of the circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).