United States v. Laboyce Kennard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the potential ‘spillover effect’ of evidence of a co-defendant’s guilt” is generally “mitigated” by “a court’s cautionary instructions”
• finding no error in permitting jury to consider evidence of defendant’s post-indictment flight as being probative of guilt
• stating a limiting instruction will normally miti- gate the risk of spillover effects
• explaining a limiting instruction will normally mitigate the risk of spillover effects
• not addressing the \same party\ issue and instead addressing only whether the SEC and the DOJ had similar motives
• “As proponents of the deposition, it was the brothers who bore the burden of establishing that it came within the former testimony hearsay exception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).