United States v. Kymberli Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a 30-minute interview in a bedroom with the door closed was noncustodial
• determining that defendant was not in custody, in part, because she was questioned by officers in a bedroom in her home and a relative entered the room on two occasions during the questioning
• finding no Miranda violation where subject questioned in own home, without restraint, and never told she was not free to leave
• “Custody determinations do not depend on the subjective views of either the interrogating law enforcement officers or of the person being questioned, but depend instead [on] the objective circumstances of the interrogation.”
• that defendant “was not handcuffed or restrained[] and [law enforcement] did not draw their weapons in [defendant’s] presence” during interrogation “in [defendant’s] own home] support finding that interrogation was non-custodial
• “Custody determinations do not depend on the subjective views of either the interrogating law enforcement officers or of the person being questioned, but depend instead [on] the objective circumstances of the interrogation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).