United States v. Krenning

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that this method of calculation is only appropriate in instances where the actual object of the fraud is the overstated value
• holding that actual loss caused by defendant who disguised the insolvency of his insurance company and continued to sell policies was losses of policyholders
• “The interests of efficiency and justice have led to a preference in the federal system for joint trials of defendants who are indicted together.”
• conspiracy to commit mail fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).