United States v. Konileti Latu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “pending I-485 application for adjustment of status d[oes] not affect . . . removability”
• holding that “[u]nlike the statutes at issue in Lopez and Morrison, [18 U.S.C.] § 922(g
• noting that defendant was “found to be in possession of a handgun on May 15, 2004,” and therefore “[t]o sustain a conviction under § 922(g)(5)(A), the government must prove that, on that date, [he] was ‘illegally or unlawfully in the United States’”
• affirming conviction of defendant who had pending application for adjustment of status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).