United States v. Kong Yin Chu, a.k.a.: Alfred Chu, Chu Kong Yin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no prosecutorial misconduct where prosecutor seeks to clarify on redirect examination issues muddied by the defense counsel on cross-examination
• holding that there is no prosecutorial misconduct where prosecutor seeks to clarify on redirect examination issues muddied by the defense counsel on cross-examination
• rejecting prosecutorial- 21 misconduct claim premised on elicitation of hearsay testimony where hearsay argument was 22 meritless
• finding prosecutor improperly elicited testimony that gambling operation was controlled by a crime syndicate
• Rule 608(b) 23 “excludes extrinsic evidence of a specific instance of conduct of a witness offered to attack the 24 witness’ credibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).