United States v. Kojo Sababu, Jaime Delgado, and Dora Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the district court’s refusal to question potential jurors during voir dire on the issues of burden of proof and the presumption of innocence” did not “deprive[ defendants] of a fair trial”
• holding that “the district court’s refusal to question po‐ tential jurors during voir dire on the issues of burden of proof and the presumption of innocence” did not “deprive[ defend‐ ants] of a fair trial”
• holding there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a telephone conversation between a non-lawyer and a federal inmate
• holding Bureau of Prisons’ practice of record- ing prisoner calls qualified as wiretapping by “an investiga- tive or law enforcement officer” under Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act
• holding Bureau of Prisons’ practice of record- ing prisoner calls qualified as wiretapping by “an investiga- tive or law enforcement officer” under Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act
• “Separate conspiracies exist when each of the conspirators’ agreements has its own end, and each constitutes an end in itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).