United States v. Knight-Castillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the plaintiff still has the burden to prove he has a disability because “[a] contrary rule would require courts to gaze into a crystal ball, put on a white coat, and divine how a given impairment would have affected the plaintiff[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).