United States v. Klanseck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of uncharged prior sexual assaults on same victim are admissible in respect of victim's credibility
• holding that evidence of uncharged prior sexual assaults on same victim are admissible in respect of victim’s credibility
• acknowledging that other-crimes evidence is at “tension” because it is “both probative and prejudicial”
• cautioning that other-crimes evidence risks \distract[ing] a jury from an independent consideration of the evidence that bears directly on guilt itself\
• trial court’s failure to instruct jury as required by State v. Stevens, 115 N.J. 289, 309, 558 A.2d 833 (1989), was not plain error under the facts of the ease

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).