Skip to main content
· 1/10/1996

United States v. Kjellstrom

Citations

  • 916 F. Supp. 902
  • 77 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1321
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2435
  • 1996 WL 88620

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Congress recognized [that the repeal] would work a hardship on certain companies that had relied to their detriment on the old law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crabb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.