United States v. Kishor Joshi, Jitendra Panchal, Jagadish Panchal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that because the defendant was alleged to have responded to the statement by nodding, the first requirement was 20 Case: 18-14529 Date Filed: 01/09/2020 Page: 21 of 45 “not at issue here”
• “Defendant errs . . . in assuming that occasional lapses from [word for word translation], particularly when they are not objected to by the defendant, will render a trial fundamentally unfair.”
• “Defendant errs . . . in assuming that occasional lapses from [word for word translation], particularly when they are not objected to by the defendant, will render a trial fundamentally unfair.”
• “Defendant errs . . . in assuming that occasional lapses from [word for word translation], particularly when they are not objected to by the defendant, will render a trial fundamentally unfair.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).