United States v. Kirk Gayle, Ann-Marie Richardson, Rohan Ingram

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this Court had requested additional briefing on the issue of deference and that both parties had agreed that a definition in 27 C.F.R. § 478.11 was not entitled to deference
• explaining that courts may consult legislative history to resolve textual ambiguity
• noting this Court had requested additional briefing on the issue of deference and both parties agreed that a definition in 27 C.F.R. § 478.11 was not entitled to deference
• “Statutory construction begins with the plain text and, if that text is unambiguous, it usually ends there as well.”
• “Statutory construction begins with the plain text and, if that text is unambiguous, it usually ends there as well.”
• “Statutory construction begins with the plain text and, if that text is unambiguous, it usually ends there as well.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).