Skip to main content
· 11/28/1989

United States v. Kim Arnold

Citations

  • 890 F.2d 825
  • 29 Fed. R. Serv. 482
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17671
  • 1989 WL 142357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing prosecutor’s statements in rebuttal argument as permissible effort to rehabilitate government witnesses following defense’s attacks on their credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wellford, Ryan, Contie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.