Skip to main content
· 7/5/1985

United States v. Kim Allen Stanley, John R. Spiczak, Evan N. Leake, Edward Lee Shorr, Russell Greenway, Stanley Dimich, and Clement James Dematto

Citations

  • 765 F.2d 1224
  • 18 Fed. R. Serv. 738
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20570

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the defense where, as was the case here, government agents instructed an informant to put the word out on the street that drugs were for sale
  • rejecting the defense where, as was the case here, government agents instructed an informant to put the word out on the street that drugs were for sale
  • “Stripped of any reliance upon the other defendants’ statements ..., the evidence at best showed only that Leake was in the hotel room ... when the agents ... returned to make the arrest.”
  • “although phone records seemed to indicate conversations between the defendant and the alleged co-conspirators, there was no evidence that the defendant had actually spoken with the other defendants”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Johnson, Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.