· 7/5/1985
United States v. Kim Allen Stanley, John R. Spiczak, Evan N. Leake, Edward Lee Shorr, Russell Greenway, Stanley Dimich, and Clement James Dematto
Citations
- 765 F.2d 1224
- 18 Fed. R. Serv. 738
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20570
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the defense where, as was the case here, government agents instructed an informant to put the word out on the street that drugs were for sale
- rejecting the defense where, as was the case here, government agents instructed an informant to put the word out on the street that drugs were for sale
- “Stripped of any reliance upon the other defendants’ statements ..., the evidence at best showed only that Leake was in the hotel room ... when the agents ... returned to make the arrest.”
- “although phone records seemed to indicate conversations between the defendant and the alleged co-conspirators, there was no evidence that the defendant had actually spoken with the other defendants”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reavley, Johnson, Higginbotham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.