United States v. Kidada Savage

Oral argument

• Argued

  92 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that policy limiting inmates’ access to newspapers and magazines did not violate First Amendment, even though no alternative existed
• ruling that policy limiting inmates’ access to newspapers and magazines did not violate First Amendment, even though no alternative existed
• holding that forbidding inmates’ access to newspapers, magazines, and photographs does not violate the First Amendment in the context of a high security prison.
• holding that forbidding inmates’ access to newspapers, magazines, and photographs does not violate the First Amendment in the context of a high security prison.
• holding that a prison policy which denies newspapers, magazines, and photographs to a group of specially dangerous inmates does not violate the First Amendment
• holding that a prison regulation that prohibited certain segregated inmates from accessing newspapers did not violate the inmates’ First Amendment rights because the policy was reasonably related to a legitimate penological objective

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).