United States v. Khalil Blackman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the imposition of a forfeiture order in the form of a money judgment is mandatory when requested by the Government
• holding that the imposition of a forfeiture order in the form of a money judgment is mandatory when requested by the Government
• holding prosecution’s evidence was “plainly sufficient” to support defendant’s conviction for brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence in violation of § 924(c
• discussing liability under Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946)
• “Where no final forfeiture order or judgment has been entered, ruling on [an excessive-fines challenge] would be premature.”
• “Where no final forfeiture order or judgment has been entered, ruling on [an excessive-fines challenge] would be premature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).