Skip to main content
· 9/22/1994

United States v. Keyvee Jones

Citations

  • 32 F.3d 1512
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26240
  • 1994 WL 481518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an obstruction enhancement was appropriate where a district court determined that the defendant’s obstruction was “absolutely clear”
  • holding the physical-restraint enhancement applied where robbers forced credit 13 Case: 17-12679 Date Filed: 04/25/2018 Page: 14 of 19 union employees into the safe room at gun point and ordered them to lie on the floor
  • noting, as one factor supporting a finding of voluntariness, that defendant “was advised of his Miranda rights twice” and “signed a waiver of rights form”
  • mentioning that the victim was “forced to comply”
  • enhancement applies where customers and employees ordered at gunpoint to move into a safe room
  • enhancement applies where customers and employees ordered at gunpoint to move into a safe room

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Birch, Carnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.