United States v. Keyon Lakeith Mitchell Duford Lee Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding argument that “the district court erred by relying upon hearsay statements in the presentence report without giving him an opportunity to confront the individuals who made the statements” is foreclosed by Navarro
• explaining jury entitled to choose among any reasonable construction of evidence
• “If a variance did occur, we reverse only if the variance prejudiced the defendant's sub stantial rights.”
• common purpose “to derive personal gain from the sale of crack cocaine in Paris[, Texas]”
• ”[T]he variance does not affect the defendant’s substantial rights as long as the government establishes the defendant's involvement in at least one of the proved conspiracies,”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).