United States v. Kevin R. Dailey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that coparticipants are frequently present at crime scenes and can be most knowledgeable witnesses available
• noting that \[l]ong ago the courts rejected the notion that the testimony of co- defendants and other interested witnesses was so likely to be unreliable that it should be excluded\
• noting that \[l]ong ago the courts rejected the notion that the testimony of co- defendants and other interested witnesses was so likely to be unreliable that it should be excluded\
• discussing the benefits of a clear agreement between the government and a contingent witness in the context of plea agreements
• discussing the benefits of a clear agreement between the government and a contingent witness in the context of plea agreements
• discussing the legality of making payments to undercover informants and the extensive procedural safeguards that make such payments legal, starting with disclosure of the payments to the defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).