United States v. Kevin Peter Olender

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that new legal theories or interpretations of the significance of evidence does not constitute “newly discovered evidence”
• “Newly discovered evidence does not include new legal theories or new interpretations of the legal significance of the evidence.”
• lay testimony based upon information supplied by witnesses inadmissible under Rule 701, noting that “firsthand knowledge or observation is essential”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).