United States v. Kevin Davis, at No. 02-4521 Kevin A. Minnis, at No. 03-1130 Reginal Scott, at No. 03-1160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]n error will affect substantial rights where it is prejudicial and affected the outcome of the district court proceedings.”
• “[A]n error will affect substantial rights where it is prejudicial and affected the outcome of the district court proceedings.”
• “Appellants have been directed to state whether they wish to challenge their sentences under Booker. For those who do not, we consider the appeal on the merits.”
• “In this opinion, we express no view on waiver or alternative sentences. We will continue to review each appeal individually. Appellants have been directed to state whether they wish to challenge their sentence under Booker. For those who do not, we consider the appeal on its merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).