United States v. Kevin Boone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “where substantial evidence of jury misconduct—including credible allegations of jury nullification or of a refusal to deliberate—arises during deliberations, a district court may, within its sound discretion, investigate the allegations”
• holding that credible allegations of misconduct can provide a basis for investigating allegations
• holding that “where substantial evidence of jury misconduct—including credible allegations of jury nullification or of a refusal to deliberate—arises during deliberations, a district court may, within its sound discretion, investigate the allegations”
• holding that “where substantial evidence of jury misconduct—including credible allegations of jury nullification or of a refusal to deliberate—arises during deliberations, a district court may, within its sound discretion, investigate the allegations”
• stating that “[t]he fact that a different judge may have chosen not to conduct a[n] investigation is irrelevant”
• holding that credible allegations of misconduct can provide a basis for investigating allegations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).