Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 9/3/1999

United States v. Kerr

Citations

51 M.J. 401
1999 CAAF LEXIS 1241
1999 WL 684177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that when the remainder of the Government’s case was strong and the defense presented no evidence to contradict it, instead relying “on suggestion and insinuation,” the M.R.E. 404(b) error was harmless
concluding that the “quality” of some wrongly admitted evidence was “of ques- tionable credibility”
holding that when the remainder of the government’s case was strong and the defense presented no evidence to contradict it, instead relying “on suggestion and insinuation,” the Mil. R. Evid. 404(b) error was harmless
holding that when the remainder of the government’s case was strong and the defense presented no evidence to contradict it, instead relying “on suggestion and insinuation,” the Mil. R. Evid. 404(b) error was harmless
stating that an appellate court reviews the entire record in evaluating a military judge’s ruling on spillover
holding proper limiting instructions are capable of mitigating harm from potential “spillover” of general considerations of criminal propensity where an accused is charged with multiple offenses at the same trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gierke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Kerr

19 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.