United States v. Kent Borden Rogers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing possibility of due process challenge to forfeiture statute in specific case of prosecutorial misconduct
• applying Caplin’s holding and determining that “the mere fact that the jeopardy [tax] assessment deprived [the defendant] of the resources to hire the investigators and accountants of his choice d[id] not in itself violate the sixth amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).