United States v. Kent Aoki Lee, AKA Kent Aoki AKA Keun Do Kent Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that developing a basic website does not require \special skills\ as established in Petersen
• holding that the defendant’s computer skills were not a special skill because, inter alia, they did not rise to the level of sophistication of the defendant’s special skills in Petersen, supra
• \[T]his adjustment becomes open-ended to the point of meaninglessness if the phrase 'special skill' is taken out of its context.\
• “[T]his sentencing guideline is best read[] as a two-part test. The test is not just whether the skill is ‘not possessed by members of the general public,’ but also, as a sine qua non, whether it is a skill ‘usually requiring substantial education, training, or licensing.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).