Skip to main content
· 8/19/1994

United States v. Kent Andrew Bender

Citations

  • 33 F.3d 21
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 22182
  • 1994 WL 445207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the de novo standard where district court made a legal interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines and applied that interpretation to the facts of the case
  • “The government has the burden of proof with respect to the base offense level and any enhancing factors.”
  • district court's factual findings as to amount of loss under § 2F1.1 reviewed for clear error
  • standard of review for determining amount of loss under § 2F1.1
  • standard of review for determining amount of loss under § 2F1.1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Magill, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.