· 8/19/1994
United States v. Kent Andrew Bender
Citations
- 33 F.3d 21
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 22182
- 1994 WL 445207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the de novo standard where district court made a legal interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines and applied that interpretation to the facts of the case
- “The government has the burden of proof with respect to the base offense level and any enhancing factors.”
- district court's factual findings as to amount of loss under § 2F1.1 reviewed for clear error
- standard of review for determining amount of loss under § 2F1.1
- standard of review for determining amount of loss under § 2F1.1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Magill, Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.