United States v. Kenneth Wimbush

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding: “[t]he judgment entered in this case indicates that Wimbush was convicted of ‘18 U.S.C. § 911(g
• affirming a defendant’s sentence while remanding for the sole purpose of correcting a typographical error in the judgment
• remanding for the limited purpose of cor- recting a typographical error in the judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).