United States v. Kenneth Turner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the warrant was sufficiently particu- lar in that: (1) it described the house to be searched with great particularity and no nearby houses met the warrant’s detailed UNITED STATES v. BROBST 2849 description; (2
• affirming denial of motion to suppress; despite mistaken house number in warrant, executing officers could rely on their knowledge to search correct premises
• upholding the search of a house although the affidavit and warrant listed the incorrect house number
• affirming denial of motion to suppress; despite mis- taken house number in warrant, executing officers could rely on their knowledge to search correct premises
• finding warrant sufficiently described the house to be searched even though the house number was wrong
• finding no violation of Fourth Amendment where warrant contained wrong street address for house to be searched but the description was otherwise sufficiently particular to identify the premises

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).