United States v. Kenneth Michael Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, where defendant was a black male, and all of the government’s witnesses and jurors were white, voir dire inquiry about racial bias may be advisable, but not required, absent special circumstances surrounding the case which indicate the possibility of racial prejudice by the jury
• instruction that arguments , of counsel are not evidence can remove prejudicial taint of improper argument
• any error in the exclusion of evidence is rendered harmless where \defendant's theory . . . was manifested to the jury through testimony which was allowed\
• any error in the exclusion of evidence is rendered <br>harmless where \defendant's theory . . . was manifested to the jury <br>through testimony which was allowed\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).