United States v. Kenneth M. Comeaux, Edmund M. Reggie, Oscar W. Boswell, II

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that mandamus is “not appropriate when “the most that could be claimed is that the district courts have erred in ruling on matters within their jurisdiction” (quoting Parr v. United States, 351 U.S. 5138, 520 (1956))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).