Skip to main content
· 2/21/1995

United States v. Kenneth M. Caudle

Citations

  • 48 F.3d 433
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 2247
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1254
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 3172
  • 1995 WL 67217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t would be most surprising if [allegedly improper evidence] had any significance in a bench trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Poole, Brunetti, Kleinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.