United States v. Kenneth L. Musgrave and Marshall Womack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a conviction despite a slip of the tongue, because the “[i]solated statements which appear prejudicial when taken out of context [were] innocuous when viewed in the light of the entire trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).