Skip to main content
· 6/16/1986

United States v. Kenneth L. Estes

Citations

  • 793 F.2d 465
  • 20 Fed. R. Serv. 1089
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the mere fact that some incompetent or privileged testimony is heard by a ... grand jury” will not “invalidate an indictment returned by it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Graafeiland, Newman, Miner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.