United States v. Kenneth J. Schulte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• application of Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 to defendant, whose charged acts occurred prior to its effective date, violates Ex Post Facto Clause
• restitution imposed under either the Victim and Witness Protection Act or the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act constitutes punishment for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause
• “The statutory notes under 18 U.S.C. § 2248 provide that the MVRA, including § 3663A, are to be effective to the extent constitutionally possible for . . . cases in which the defendant is convicted on or after April 24, 1996.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).