United States v. Kenneth J. Masat

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that defendant must show \(i) he relied in good faith on a professional and (ii) he made complete disclosure of all the relevant facts\
• rejecting argument that court lacks jurisdiction over one who declares himself “non-citizen,” “non-resident” and “freeman”
• rejecting appellant’s argument that court lacked jurisdiction over him because he was a “freeman”
• finding appellant’s lack of personal jurisdiction contention based on claimed status of “non- citizen,” “non-resident,” and “freeman” was frivolous as he was indicted, appeared before district court, and presented appellate court no authority for argument
• \Trial judges have substantial latitude in tailoring their instructions if they fairly and adequately cover the issues presented in the case.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).