United States v. Kenneth Huie Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “isolated comments” made by the district court outside the presence of the jury were “simply . . . not sufficient to show trial prejudice”
• stating the Government does not bear the burden of demonstrating an extension of time was warranted and implying the extension is automatic where no grand jury is in session
• “It has been held time and again that an illegal arrest and detention, without more, does not void a subsequent prosecution.”
• “A district court has broad discretion in determining where within a district a trial will be held, and to overturn the court’s decision the defendant must prove abuse of that discretion or prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).