United States v. Kenneth Hammond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the evidence was sufficient to show that a pharmacist participated in and furthered a physician’s scheme in part because (1) “the great bulk of prescriptions issued” by that physician were filled by the pharmacist, and (2
• \Courts may consider evidence of attempts to influence a witness as relevant in showing a consciousness of guilt.\
• no abuse of discretion to admit testimony that defendant “had used various means, including offers of money, in an attempt to persuade [witness] not to testify” was “evidence of attempts to influence a witness as relevant in showing consciousness of guilt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).