United States v. Kenneth Grossman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court correctly excluded evidence where its probative val ue as to defendant’s associate was minimal compared to its prejudicial effect on defendant
• holding that there is probable cause to search the part-time residence of a defendant known to deal drugs, despite the lack of direct evidence that drugs are kept there
• concluding that trial court correctly excluded evidence where its probative value as to defendant’s associate was minimal compared to its prejudicial effect on defendant
• noting that “it is reasonable to suspect that a drug dealer stores drugs in a home to which he owns a key.”
• noting that criminal history and suspicious explanations and behavior are relevant factors in probable cause determination
• holding it reasonable to suspect that a drug dealer stores drugs in a residence to which he has access

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).