United States v. Kenneth F. Yellowe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not clearly erroneous for a district court to calculate loss by multiplying the minimum loss calculation by the amount of useable credit card numbers in the defendant’s possession, even though the defendant had used none of the numbers
• “We have long distinguished between passive and active 25 resistance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).