Skip to main content
· 12/20/2012

United States v. Kenneth Cochrane

Citations

  • 702 F.3d 334
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25980

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The district court need not state its rationale [for a consecutive sentence] explicitly . . .”
  • “[I]n order for a sentence to be procedurally reasonable, the record must contain the district court’s rationale for concluding that the sentence imposed is sufficient but not greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes of sentencing set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clay, Stranch, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.