United States v. Kenneth Alvin Hendershot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that affiant’s conclusion “based on [his] experience from prior bank robbery investigations” was proper; emphasizing that “[i]t is not necessary to detail that experience to determine that the conclusion is not capricious” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).