United States v. Ken Ramirez, Peter Hotchkiss, Paul Hotchkiss, and Patrick Flynn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The term [mobile interception device] in context means a device for intercepting mobile communications . . . .”
• “An interception takes place both where the phone is located . . . and where the scanner used to make the interception is located.” (citations omitted)
• “An interception takes place both where the phone is located . . . and where the scanner used to make the interception is located.” (citations omitted)
• “An interception takes place both where the phone is located . . . and where the scanner used to make the interception is located.” (citations omitted)
• “[0]nce [a] mistake is discovered, the government cannot use the authority of the warrant ... to conduct a search . . . that they know is unsupported by probable cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).