Skip to main content
· 4/19/2002

United States v. Kempis-Bonola

Citations

  • 287 F.3d 699
  • 2002 WL 598221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a determination of whether a prior conviction is aggravated does not fall outside of the Apprendi exception
  • “[I]t is entirely appropriate for judges to have the task of finding not only the mere fact of previous convictions but other related issues as well.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[I]t is entirely appropriate for judges to have the task of finding not only the mere fact of previous convictions but other related issues as well.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hansen, Heaney, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.