· 4/19/2002
United States v. Kempis-Bonola
Citations
- 287 F.3d 699
- 2002 WL 598221
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a determination of whether a prior conviction is aggravated does not fall outside of the Apprendi exception
- “[I]t is entirely appropriate for judges to have the task of finding not only the mere fact of previous convictions but other related issues as well.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- “[I]t is entirely appropriate for judges to have the task of finding not only the mere fact of previous convictions but other related issues as well.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hansen, Heaney, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.