United States v. Kelvan Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a suspect’s “reluctance” to a search of his luggage “was not enough to indicate he had withdrawn his unambiguous statement of consent”
• holding airline passenger voluntarily consented to a search of his checked luggage
• applying without discussing clear error standard to district court’s conclusion on whether defendant’s actions were “enough to indicate he had withdrawn his unambiguous statement of consent”
• no \seizure\ where brief detention of luggage would not have interfered with defendant's travel or frustrated his expectations with respect to his luggage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).