United States v. Kelly Jemison and Donial Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that it would be \naïve\ to conclude that Jemison had no reason to think guns he sold to a gang would be used to commit other felonies; \the public [is] not blissfully ignorant of the connection between criminal violence and street gangs\
• reasoning that it would be “naïve” to conclude that Jemison had no reason to think guns he sold to a gang would be used to commit other felonies; “the public [is] not blissfully ignorant of the connection between criminal vio- lence and street gangs”
• reasoning that it would be “naïve” to conclude that Jemison had no reason to think guns he sold to a gang would be used to commit other felonies; “the public [is] not blissfully ignorant of the connection between criminal vio- lence and street gangs”
• “We have previously recognized that a valid appellate waiver, though binding in other respects, does not preclude judicial review of a criminal defendant’s assertion that her plea agreement was itself the product of ineffective assistance of counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).