Skip to main content
· 2/11/1994

United States v. Keith T. Engstrom Sheryl L. Engstrom, William A. Cohan, Esq., in Re William A. Cohan, Esq.

Citations

  • 16 F.3d 1006
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1060
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 1849
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 2156
  • 1994 WL 37766

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • procedural due process does not require that attorney be allowed to present all evidence at evidentiary hearing in attorney disciplinary proceeding, but only notice and opportunity to be heard
  • “Absent waiver, the District would be entitled to 17 sovereign immunity because California community college districts constitute arms of the 18 state entitled to sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Wright, Noonan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.