United States v. Keith Simmons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e interpreted Santos narrowly to bind lower courts only in cases where illegal gambling constituted the predicate for the defendant’s money- laundering conviction.”
• “But, because the merger problem provided the ‘driving force’ behind both the plurality’s and Justice Stevens’s opinions, we recognized that Santos compelled us to construe the money-laundering statute so as to avoid punishing a defendant twice for the same offense.”
• “But, because the merger problem provided the ‘driving force’ behind both the plurality’s and Justice Stevens’s opinions, we recognized that Santos compelled us to construe the money- laundering statute so as to avoid punishing a defendant twice for the same offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Richard Olive
  Sixth Circuit· 2015-09-22· cited 27×
• United States v. McQueen
  Sixth Circuit· 2016-01-19· cited 1×
• United States v. Donald Booker
  Fourth Circuit· 2025-07-22

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sullivan v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
• Marks v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 2,149×
• United States v. Santos
  Supreme Court· 2008-06-02· cited 812×
• United States v. Salomon S. Loayza
  Fourth Circuit· 1997-02-25· cited 108×
• United States v. Van Alstyne
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-10-22· cited 105×
• United States v. Cloud
  Fourth Circuit· 2012-05-31· cited 81×
• United States v. Mehta
  Fourth Circuit· 2010-02-05· cited 73×
• Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Sagardía De Jesús
  First Circuit· 2011-02-07· cited 48×
• United States v. Halstead
  Fourth Circuit· 2011-03-07· cited 33×
• United States v. Adley Abdulwahab
  Fourth Circuit· 2013-04-29· cited 21×