Skip to main content
· 4/8/2002

United States v. Keith Everett Maxwell

Citations

  • 285 F.3d 336
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 6458
  • 2002 WL 522836

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that imposition of supervised release revocation sentence above statutory maximum for single count of conviction was plain error warranting correction
  • holding that imposition of supervised release revocation sentence above statutory maximum for single count of conviction was plain error warranting correction
  • noting that “conditions of supervised release are a substantial imposition on a person’s liberty”
  • relying, in absence of controlling authority, on clear statutory text and uniform case law in three other circuits to find plain error
  • subtracting only the months of imprisonment from the supervised release available upon his second revocation
  • reviewing for plain error unpreserved claim that sentence following revocation of supervised release was greater than that authorized by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Widener, Motz, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.