United States v. Keith Cimera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the evidence must be in fact, newly discovered, i.e., discovered since the trial”
• failure to realize the relevance of evidence in the defendant’s possession did not render the evidence newly discovered; citing several Circuits in agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).