Skip to main content
· 8/28/2006

United States v. Keenan Price

Citations

  • 458 F.3d 202
  • 2006 WL 1795108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that courts must exclude evidence not legitimately needed to explain the background of police behavior
  • holding that courts must exclude evidence not legitimately needed to explain the background of police behavior
  • holding that courts must exclude evidence not legitimately needed to explain the background of police behavior
  • holding that courts must exclude evidence not legitimately needed to explain the background of police behavior
  • holding that police officers are permitted “to explain the background context for their arrival at a scene” and that such background statements are admissible nonhearsay “[w]hen the explanation cannot be effected without relating some contents of the information received”
  • whether statement is hearsay is legal question subject to plenary review; whether statement satisfies relevant requirements for hearsay exception is subject to review for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Chagares, Reavley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.